logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2019.03.28 2018도20918
특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)등
Text

All appeals are dismissed.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment regarding Defendant A’s ground of appeal in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not exhaust all necessary deliberations and did not err by misapprehending the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the crime of occupational breach of trust, on the grounds stated in its reasoning.

2. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment regarding Defendant B and H’s grounds of appeal in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court convicted Defendant B and H of each fraud (excluding the part not guilty in the grounds of appeal) among the facts charged in the instant case, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, did not err by misapprehending the facts beyond the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by violating

3. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment regarding Defendant C’s grounds of appeal in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower judgment convicting Defendant C of fraud (excluding the part not guilty in the grounds of appeal) among the facts charged in the instant case did not exhaust all necessary deliberations and did not err by misapprehending the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine as to the intent of fraud,

4. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment regarding Defendant I’s grounds of appeal in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower judgment convicting Defendant I of the charge of fraud (excluding the part not guilty in the grounds of appeal) against the Defendant I out of the instant facts charged did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence inconsistent with logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on fraud, and by misapprehending

arrow