The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. At the time of misunderstanding the facts, the Defendant was guilty of the facts charged in this case, inasmuch as there was only a serious injury on the part of the victim by her hand, and there was no injury due to her snow damage, and the lower court convicted of the Defendant. In so doing, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts.

B. The lower court’s sentence against an unfair defendant (nine months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, two years of protection observation) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. On February 9, 2017, the Defendant of the instant facts charged: (a) on February 17, 2017, the victim E (50 years of age) was aware of the number of days of treatment and the mouth, etc. on the ground that the victim E (50 years of age) took a bath under the influence of alcohol.

2) 당 심의 판단 원심 및 당 심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하여 인정되는 다음의 사정, 즉 피해자 E은 ‘ 피고인이 반지를 낀 채로 오른쪽 눈 부위를 때려 자신은 정신을 잃었고, 오른쪽 눈이 퉁퉁 부어 시퍼렇게 멍이 들었으며, 사건 발생 다음날 부산 의료원에 가서 CT 사진을 찍었는데 큰 병원으로 가보라고 하여 백병원에 갔다’ 고 진술하고 있는 점( 증거기록 제 7 쪽), 부산 의료원에서 발급된 진료 소견서( 증거기록 제 28 쪽 )에는 ‘ 안과 외래 검사상 우 안 안구 주위 타박상 및 결 막하 출혈, 우 안 안와 골절 의증 소견이 관찰됩니다.

He requested the examination and treatment of a higher-level hospital suspected of Abagrance and Abag.

“Along with the victim’s statement on the upper part of the body (Evidence No. 29 page) of the victim, the victim’s photograph (Evidence No. 29 page) is consistent with the victim’s statement, and the Defendant India’s investigative agency stated that “a victim was satisfing with the victim’s bath at the time and was satisfing with the victim’s satisfing, and the victim was satisfing, and the victim was satisfing, and the victim was satisfing with the other victim’s satisfing and drinking.”