The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s punishment (amounting to two million won) is too unreasonable.

2. In a case where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared with the first instance court, and where the sentencing of the first instance does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect such a case (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015, etc.). The circumstance that the Defendant led to the confession of each of the instant crimes is recognized.

However, the lower court also seems to have determined the sentence in consideration of the favorable circumstances, and there is no change of circumstances that may be newly considered in the sentencing after the pronouncement of the lower judgment, each of the instant crimes is not good to form a crime that the Defendant injured the victim and threatened the victim in knife; the victim wants to punish the Defendant; and other circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive, background, means and consequence of the crime, etc., which are conditions for the sentencing specified in the instant case, such as the circumstances after the crime, are too unreasonable.

The defendant's argument of sentencing is not accepted.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless.