logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2019.06.21 2018고정278
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be the day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

A. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) is a person who drives a B-car vehicle.

On October 21, 2018, the Defendant driven the car volume at around 14:00, while driving the car at around 15:2, the crossing of the square at around 156, which is located in the 156-day, is going to proceed to the direction of 3 square from the direction of C.

At this time, the traffic signals are installed, and there was a damaged vehicle that had been driven earlier at the time, so the person engaged in driving service had a duty of care to prevent accidents by checking the condition of the vehicle that was driven by the bypass and proceeding by the bypass.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence of neglecting this, the part of the defendant's driving car B in front of the damaged vehicle's driving car was shocked by the part of the damaged vehicle's driving in front of the bypass.

As a result, the Defendant, due to the above occupational negligence, suffered injury to the driver E of the victimized vehicle (n, 40 years old), such as salt ties, tensions, etc., in the fluenites F (n, 68 years old), which requires approximately two weeks of treatment, from the injury to the fluenites F (n, f8 years old). The Defendant suffered from the fluenites and tensions that require approximately one week of treatment from the fluenite G (ma, 5 years old).

B. The act of violation of the Road Traffic Act as referred to in Paragraph A(A) was damaged by the property equivalent to KRW 1,543,604, such as repair cost, such as the exchange of D-Motor vehicles in the D-car quantity, which driven the victim E (n, 40 years old).

(c) No automobile which is not covered by the mandatory insurance policy, which violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, shall be operated on the road;

Nevertheless, the Defendant purchased the foregoing B car volume on May 3, 2018 and caused a traffic accident during the operation of the said car which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the date and place of the above B “A” as the actual owner.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect of the defendant;

arrow