1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 15, 2013, the Plaintiff entered the Army and was discharged from military service on July 14, 2015, while serving as a guard for the military.

B. On December 30, 2014, the Plaintiff asserted that “the head of the observation bridge, who had been in military service on December 30, 2014, fells down stairs for an instrument, and fell down to vae kne, and was diagnosed by an external hospital to undergo a medical examination that, as a result of the medical examination conducted by the outside hospital, left knee kne knebs and half-months, require an operation, and received an operation.” On May 21, 2017, the Plaintiff applied for the registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State to the Defendant on the ground that the Defendant rendered distinguished services to the State on November 21, 2017, and received a decision on the relevant requirements for the person eligible for veteran’s compensation from the Defendant as “the left kne kne se se se se se se se se se se se se se se se se se.”

C. On December 21, 2017, the Plaintiff received a physical examination to determine a disability rating at B Hospital, but on March 12, 2018, the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement held on March 12, 2018 decided that the Plaintiff did not meet the criteria for a disability rating. Accordingly, on April 17, 2018, the Defendant rendered a decision against the Plaintiff as to whether the Plaintiff was eligible for veteran’s compensation (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 6 through 10, Eul evidence 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is that, even after discharge, the Plaintiff feel serious pains to the extent that it is likely to cause a great trouble in daily life due to the occurrence of malutism, such as crypitis, etc., on the part of the above injury group. Therefore, the Plaintiff is a person who falls under class 7 of disability rating or class 4115 of disability rating as “persons who normally have labor ability but have a strong impulse, and have continued to engage in labor,” or “persons whose malute changes after external wound due to damage to the mar-ray clearly appear in the inspection such as X-ray