The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (one year of imprisonment and two years of suspended execution, etc.) is too unhutiled and unfair.

B. It is improper for the lower court to exempt the Defendant from disclosure and notification orders with respect to the Defendant’s personal information.

2. Determination

A. The Defendant followed the degree of 100 meters by stating that “The victim, a female student under 15 years of age, who had no awareness of her way on the alleyway, her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her but her her her her her her her her her her

Since sex offenses against victimized children and juveniles are highly likely to have an adverse impact on the mental development of victimized children and juveniles in itself, the victim appears to have received considerable mental impulse, and the victim seems to have negative impact on forming a sound sexual value in the future, and the defendant was not able to have been used by the victim, and the defendant committed the crime of this case while under the influence of alcohol without being aware of it, in light of the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case while under the influence of alcohol in the case of domestic violence.

On the other hand, however, there are circumstances that can be considered in the following circumstances.

Although the Defendant was unable to properly associate with the instant crime, all of the instant crimes are recognized.

It seems that the degree of indecent act is not severe.

Since around 2007, the Defendant was hospitalized at a mental hospital several times due to serious alcohol dependence and depression, and was still suffering from alcohol dependence and depression even at the time of the instant crime. This seems to have been influenced by the crime of this case.

The defendant has been punished for a sex offense in excess of the past record or fine.