logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.08.10 2018노709
사기
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal was as follows: (a) the Defendant registered the transfer of ownership of the land and public land portion owned by the victim as indicated in the facts charged in the instant case (hereinafter “instant share”) from the injured party at the time of the instant case; and (b) obtained a loan as security, and subsequently, was thought to pay the price for

Therefore, the defendant did not have the intention to acquire the above shares at that time and had the intent and ability to return the shares to the victim again, but the time has passed due to the personal circumstances of the defendant, resulting in not paying the price for the above shares or returning the ownership.

However, the judgment of the court below which found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is erroneous in the misunderstanding of facts or by misapprehending of legal principles.

2. Determination

A. Fraud is established by deceiving others, leaving them into mistake, inducing a dispositive act, thereby obtaining property or pecuniary advantage. It must be related to deception, mistake, or property disposal act.

On the other hand, whether a certain act constitutes a deception that causes mistake to others, and whether such deception and property disposal act are related to a person ought to be determined generally and objectively by taking into account the transactional situation, the other party’s knowledge, character, experience, occupation, and other specific circumstances at the time of the act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2013Do969, Feb. 27, 2014). (b) The evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court reveals the following facts and circumstances.

① The Defendant was unable for a business operator, who had been operating at the time of receiving the registration for transfer of ownership from the injured party in the course of receiving the instant equity loan by taking the instant equity loan as security, to take account of operating funds, employees’ benefits, etc., and further loans are extended by taking the Defendant’s property, etc. as security.

arrow