logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.10.26 2017고정907
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, he shall be 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in the duties of driving the B Cost Star Co., Ltd. owned by the Defendant.

On May 29, 2017, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at a speed of 23:45, and driven the front road of the members of Ansan-si from the direction of the city to the direction of the mountain.

Since there are many vehicles parked at the edge of a road due to the concentration of factories, etc., a person engaged in driving duty has a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the front section and the left and right, and accurately manipulating the steering system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was negligent in driving on a stroke while neglecting this, and was parked in a place where a marina accident occurred due to negligence when he neglected to drive on the stroke.

D(40) The part of the panion in front of the driver’s seat of the E-Ma-ri-U.M. is shocked by the part of the Defendant’s driver’s seat in front of the vehicle’s seat, and that part was parked on the rear side while pushing the vehicle in front of the above horse’s seat.

F(35 years old, South) caused the front part of the G-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W

Ultimately, the Defendant did not take necessary measures at the site after destroying the property that requires an amount equivalent to KRW 9,354,797 for repair of the above damaged vehicles due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement;

1. Determination as to the Defendant’s assertion in each written estimate

1. The defendant alleged that this case only destroyed a parked vehicle, and Article 148 of the Road Traffic Act, which excludes "a person who does not provide personal information to the victim pursuant to Article 54 (1) 2 where it is obvious that only a parked vehicle has been damaged by a parked vehicle," and the defendant's act does not provide personal information to the victim pursuant to Article 156 subparagraph 10 of the same Act (Article 54 (1) 2 where it is obvious that only a parked vehicle has been damaged by a parked or stopped vehicle). The person who did not provide personal information to the victim pursuant to Article 54 (1) 2 of the same Act.

arrow