1. From January 4, 2016 to January 4, 2016, the Defendant indicated in the attached Form No. 1, 2, 3, 4, from the Plaintiff’s KRW 5,00,00 to the Plaintiff.

1. According to the overall purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4 as to the cause of the claim and the entire pleadings, C, on August 4, 2004, leased the lease deposit of KRW 5 million, monthly rent of KRW 300,000,000,000,000,000,000 in the ship (hereinafter "the instant real estate") connected each point of the items of the attached drawings Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1 among the buildings listed in the attached Form Nos. 1 to the defendant on August 4, 2004, and changed the agreement to KRW 2.50,00,000,000,000,000,000,000 won for the following month, C sold the instant real estate to D and E around December 27, 2006, D and E expressed their intent to refuse to renew the lease on the ground of redevelopment of the real estate from March 2, 2014.

According to the above facts, since the lease contract for the instant real estate was terminated on August 3, 2014, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the instant real estate to the Plaintiff at the same time with the remainder of money obtained from the Plaintiff after deducting the amount calculated at the rate of KRW 250,000 per month from January 4, 2016 to the completion date of delivery of the instant real estate.

2. The defendant's assertion is alleged to the purport that it is improper to demand the delivery of the real estate of this case without any compensation procedure, such as directors' expenses, even though the defendant living in the real estate of this case for more than 12 years, even though he/she had resided in the real estate of this case for more than 12 years. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge the compensation for

3. Conclusion, the Plaintiff’s claim of this case is accepted on the grounds of its reasoning.