The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal by the defendant is that the sentence of the court below that sentenced the defendant to imprisonment for three years and six months and confiscation is too unreasonable in light of the fact that the defendant voluntarily led to the confession of the crime and the family environment of the defendant.

Considering all the above circumstances asserted by the defendant, the defendant, and his defense counsel, the crime of this case was committed in this case by installing a malomeras, which occurred outside of the entrance of another person's apartment house, to grasp the password of the locking device of the malomer, and the entrance and exit pattern of the residents of the apartment, and then theft the property by intrusion on their residence, and there is a very poor number of crimes. The crime of this case was committed in 14 times, and the defendant has already been punished for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (thief) through several times, etc., and the defendant has already been punished for a prison sentence and suspended execution due to a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (thief). In addition, in full view of the following circumstances, the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit.