(영문) 광주지방법원 2021.02.10 2020노599 | 리걸엔진

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 광주지방법원 2021.02.10 2020노599

폭행등

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. As to interference with the business of misunderstanding facts, the Defendant only scruged wals with the victim in the process of responding to walscrusation, and did not interfere with the victim's restaurant operation.

B. The sentence of the lower court’s unfair sentencing (an amount of KRW 700,000) is too unreasonable.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court regarding the assertion of mistake of facts: ① the victim, from the investigative agency to the court of the lower court, was unable to have the Defendant avoided the disturbance while taking the victim’s restaurant by taking a large voice from the victim’s restaurant, and the Defendant was unable to take a part in the victim’s restaurant, even after the Defendant was faced with a serious voice from the victim’s restaurant to the court of the lower court; ② during the process of taking back wrue, the Defendant was unable to have the Defendant her wrud while taking a wruth; ② E running a wrud in the front place, sent a witness to the effect that the Defendant was unable to enter the restaurant before the restaurant.

In full view of the fact that the above victim’s statement is consistent with the above victim’s statement, and ③ the defendant also stated that the fact that he fightd with I and money was recognized during the investigation process, the defendant interfered with the victim’s business by force, as shown in the facts charged in the instant case, beyond the mere degree of dispute with the victim.

may be appointed by a person.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of obstruction of business is just and acceptable, and the defendant's assertion of mistake of facts is not accepted.

3. The Defendant has no record of having been punished for the same offense.

On the other hand, the defendant merely causes disturbance in the restaurant of the victimized person, or takes a bath to the injured person.

유사 판례

-서울북부지방법원 2015.07.21 2015고단1079

-제주지방법원 2015.05.29 2015고정82

-서울동부지방법원 2014.04.16 2014고정500

-의정부지방법원 고양지원 2017.04.20 2017고단48

-대구지방법원 서부지원 2015.10.02 2015고정709