1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff is a person who operated an entertainment drinking club (hereinafter “instant entertainment drinking club”) with the trade name “C” on the first floor of Gangnam-gu Seoul (hereinafter “C”) from July 2010.

B. On April 26, 2016, the Plaintiff, who served as the so-called “mast” in the instant entertainment tavern, was controlled on the ground that D, a male customer, who found in the said entertainment tavern around 20:0, would receive KRW 2.80,000 from E, F, and G, respectively, as the price for sexual traffic, and that during the period from 22:16 to 22:47 of the same day, the Plaintiff committed an act of arranging sexual traffic, etc. for business purposes by having J, K, and L, who are female employees of the said entertainment tavern in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, engage in sexual intercourse with the said male customer (hereinafter “instant arrangement”).

C. On October 27, 2015, the Plaintiff was subject to a disposition of business suspension for two months (from August 29, 2016 to October 25, 2016) due to the act of arranging sexual traffic, etc. in the entertainment tavern in the instant case. On October 21, 2016, the Defendant issued a disposition to revoke the relevant business license (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff had committed the instant act of arranging sexual traffic, notwithstanding the first violation.

[Ground of recognition] The facts without any dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 3, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 4, 13, 14, 23, 25, 29, 32, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The Plaintiff did not have taken part in the act of arranging sexual traffic or engaging in sexual traffic as seen above by D, etc. The Plaintiff did not have taken part in the act of arranging sexual traffic or arranging sexual traffic. Although the Plaintiff, a real operator of the instant entertainment drinking club, was justified to the end of doing the act of arranging sexual traffic, D or the above J, etc., committed the act of arranging sexual traffic or arranging sexual traffic with the Plaintiff or male customers in the future, it is unreasonable to hold the Plaintiff liable for the instant act of arranging sexual traffic.