logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2016.04.08 2015고단2307
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 30, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 00:18, the 160 Yongsan-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, the Defendant stopped a taxi in accordance with the traffic signals by the victim B (58 taxes) who was boarding a passenger on the front of the Yongsan-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, pursuant to the Defendant’s 160-ro, and was at one time the victim’s face.

Accordingly, the injured person proceeded with a taxi in accordance with the new subparagraph, set the above taxi on the front of the nearby native military center, and set the defendant's face on the ground that the injured person would get off the taxi at the above taxi, "I am the mother's mother, the mother's mother's mother, the mother's mother's mother's mother, and the mother's mother's mother is the mother's mother's mother's mother, as soon as possible, or it is the son's mother, and the victim's face was taken several times."

As a result, the Defendant inflicted bodily injury on the victim, such as chrokes, tensions, etc. requiring approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. On January 13, 2015, the Defendant, on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order, was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) on January 13, 2015, and was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for committing the instant crime during the period of probation, despite the fact that the Defendant again committed the instant crime during the period of probation, and used violence against the victim without any particular reason, the need to punish the Defendant significantly is recognized.

However, on the other hand, in light of the fact that the defendant made an agreement with the victim while against the mistake, the fact that there is a possibility of 20 young people's opening, the degree of damage, etc., the defendant is sentenced to the punishment.

arrow