logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2019.05.08 2018고합270
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매강요등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

One (No. 2) shall be forfeited from a seized camping net.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant lent KRW 1,00,000,000, respectively, to the victim B (the age of 17) who became aware of through his bubs and paid the principal and 50% interest per week to the victim B (the age of 17), on August 9, 2018 and August 12, 2018, on condition that he shall pay the principal and 50% interest, but he did not pay the money properly and used the money to the victim B and her male-gu victim D (the male-gu victim D, 18 years old) to receive the money.

1. On August 20, 2018, the Defendant and E were in violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint violence) around 01:00, around 01:00, in front of the 'G located in the Northern-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu.’ On the front of the 'G', the Defendant was contacted with the Defendant, and the victim D was able to get off the said vehicle at the rear seat of the vehicle in which the Defendant driven. However, if the victim D did not properly answer the vehicle, the Defendant was driving the vehicle at the lower seat of the vehicle in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul., Seoul, where the victim D was unable to answer the vehicle, and even if the Defendant re-entered the “B present, what is the victim D is,” the Defendant was ambiguousd with the head debt of the victim D, and again, the Defendants continued driving the vehicle on the above vehicle, and then, the Defendant could move the victim to the 'I Hak-gu, Seocheon-gu.’

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim D jointly with E.

2. At around 12:00 on October 3, 2018, the victims discovered the fact that the victims had been satisfed in Pyeongtaek-siK on the part of violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (the coercion of sexual traffic), violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint conflict), and violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint confinement) and the Defendant, C, E, and J discovered the victims who had been waiting for the above telecom, and C, while waiting for the victims before the above telecom.

arrow