1. The Defendant’s KRW 7,255,851 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from June 17, 2013 to October 8, 2015.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The facts of recognition B, at around 14:20 on June 17, 2013, driven by C Adodold vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) and went to the left in violation of the signal at the port distance at the port of 00, e.g., e., e., the right side of the Defendant vehicle, where the Plaintiff’s driving Dold Co., Ltd. turns to the right side of the Defendant vehicle (hereinafter “the instant accident”). Accordingly, the Plaintiff suffered injury, such as an escape certificate, etc., No. 4-5, in the direction of opposition.

The defendant is an insurer who has concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the defendant vehicle.

[Evidence] The description of evidence Nos. 3 and 4 and the purport of the whole pleading

B. According to the facts found as above, since B was driving the Defendant’s vehicle while causing the instant accident and thereby causing injury to the Plaintiff, the Defendant is liable for compensating the Plaintiff for the damages incurred by the instant accident.

C. At the time of the instant accident, at the time of the instant accident, the Plaintiff driven an error in contravention of the designated lane, and such error appears to have influenced the occurrence of the instant accident, thereby limiting the Defendant’s liability to 95% by taking account of the foregoing.

(5) The Defendant asserted that the Plaintiff was negligent in failing to wear a protective gear while driving the otoba while passing through the intersection and neglecting to reduce the speed. However, the instant accident was caused by the Defendant’s vehicle’s left-hand turn in violation of the signal while the Plaintiff driving the otoba and leaving the intersection in accordance with the new code. At the time of the Plaintiff entering the intersection, the Defendant’s vehicle had already left-hand left-hand turn.

Considering the fact that there is no evidence that it was a situation in which it is anticipated to turn to the left or in violation of the signal, the Plaintiff is running along the intersection with the Defendant’s vehicle while proceeding the intersection.