A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 2018, the Defendant: (a) received a proposal from a person who was in the name of the police officer in the name of the Defendant, stating, “The credit rating is low, and it is possible to loan up to 23 million won when raising the credit rating; (b) if sending the check card, it is possible to create a false transaction performance through entering the check, and then post the loan after counting the credit rating.” (c) because it is impossible to obtain a credit loan in a normal way, the Defendant lent a approaching medium connected to the Defendant’s account to the non-person in the name of the Defendant’s name, and then, he/she submitted it to him/her as the material that was the normal transaction performance of the Defendant, and then accepted the fraud of receiving a credit loan.

On August 14, 2018, around 499, the Defendant sent a physical card No. 499, to a third party via Kwikset Service, which is an access medium connected to the Saemaul Treasury Account (Serial (B) in the name of the Defendant, and informed the name influence to the deceased through Kwikset Stockholm.

Accordingly, the Defendant used access media to commit the above crimes against others.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s authentic statements and written statements;

1. Inquiries about liquidity transactions, application of personal information on account holders, and details of transactions to Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts and Article 49 (4) 2 and Article 6 (3) 3 of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions through which the punishment is chosen (or choice of imprisonment);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) that the defendant has no criminal record of the same kind, has committed a confession, and his mistake is repented in depth while the defendant committed the crime in this case, and there is no profit gained by