logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.03.16 2016고단7128
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 11, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement that “The 27,439,000 won guarantee, monthly rent of KRW 1,551,344 shall be paid on the 20th day of each month, and the 1,551,344 won shall be lent on the 48-month basis to an employee in the D convenience store operated by the Defendant in Jincheon-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do.”

However, at the time of fact, the Defendant was unable to pay monthly rent or monthly wage for employees due to the difficulty in operating the above convenience store, and the Defendant did not pay an attempted sales amounting to KRW 50,000,000,000, which was not paid to the F head office from December 2012, and the said car lease deposit was not paid in excess of KRW 27,439,00,000, and there was no ability or intent to pay the lease fee even if the car is leased from the victimized company due to the situation where the said car is to be paid instead of the said car.

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victimized Company as above; (b) concluded a lease agreement for the said car with the victimized Company; and (c) around June 12, 2013, issued one vehicle for Ei A6 passenger cars equivalent to KRW 83,628,290 for the acquisition cost, which is equivalent to KRW 83,628,290, around D convenience stores.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

"2016 Highest 8507"

1. On August 12, 2013, the Defendant, around August 2013, in the context of “I” operated by H located in Chungcheongnam-gun G, Chungcheong-gun on August 12, 2013, there is no repair cost to the victim J that “I shall repair E-A-car operated within the country due to an accident.”

The reason was that the insurer would receive the premium from the insurance company on the face of the State with a loan of KRW 27 million, and would pay the premium by disposing of the convenience store operated within the country.

However, in fact, the defendant purchased a car equivalent to KRW 83 million at the above market price through a capital company, or was unable to pay monthly rent or deposit at all. The convenience store operated by the defendant was at the head office.

arrow