logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2018.07.11 2016고정792
공익사업을위한토지등의취득및보상에관한법률위반
Text

The sentence of sentence shall be suspended for the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The owners of land, persons concerned, and other persons who do not include landowners or persons concerned, but hold rights to the land to be expropriated or used or goods thereon shall deliver or transfer such land or goods to the project executor by no later than the commencement date of expropriation or use.

While the Defendant, with the trade name of “E” in Overcheon City D, was engaged in the business of selling flowers, the Defendant was incorporated into the “G Highway Private Investment Project,” which is implemented by the head of the Seoul Regional Land Management Office of the Ministry of Construction and Transportation, the Ministry of Construction and Transportation with respect to the transportation of the land of the F and publicly notified by the Minister of Construction and Transportation. As such, the Defendant failed to transfer the said land to the head of the Seoul Regional Land Management Office, which is the project executor, even though he had to transfer the plastic houses, etc., which are obstacles to the said land from November 23, 201

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Copy of the police statement made to H;

1. A written accusation;

1. A written ruling of the Central Land Expropriation Committee;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes in the Official Gazette;

1. Article 95-2 and Article 43 of the Act on Acquisition of and Compensation for Land, etc. for Public Works Projects for the Preparation of Relevant Acts concerning facts constituting an offense and Articles 95-2 and 95-2;

1. A fine of 1.5 million won to be suspended;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The defendant and the defense counsel asserted that the defendant refused to transfer the obstacles temporarily for the purpose of preserving the site before the execution of appraisal procedures in the administrative litigation related to land compensation, and that such refusal constitutes a legitimate defense or a legitimate act. The defendant asserted that the defendant refused to transfer the obstacles temporarily for the purpose of preserving the site before the execution of appraisal procedures in the administrative litigation related to land compensation.

However, the relevant laws and regulations.

arrow