logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2019.05.09 2019고단1013
도로교통법위반(무면허운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 12:10 on December 30, 2018, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act, the Road Traffic Act (Free Driver’s License) and the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Preferred to as the “Violation”). Around 12:10 on December 30, 2018, the Defendant: (a) driven a business BF car under the influence of alcohol concentration of at least 0.057% without a driver’s license; (b) was negligent in driving the CF car under the influence of alcohol concentration of at least 0.057, while driving the car under the influence of alcohol level without a driver’s license; (c) was driven by the victim C (the 48 years old) who stops at the front of the end of the vehicle at the front of the vehicle at the time (the 48 years old); and (d) was driven by the victim’s vehicle at the front of the vehicle at the front of the Defendant’s driver’s license; and (d) was driven by the 7th of the vehicle at the rear end of the vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant by such occupational negligence inflicted injury on the victim C such as salt, tensions, etc. in light of tensions for about three weeks in need of medical treatment, and inflicted injury on the victim G (the 46-year old-old-age-old-car (the 46-year-old-car), such as chills, tensions, etc. in need of medical treatment for about two weeks, on the part of the victim E, on the part of the victim H (the 46-year-old-car), on the part of the victim H (the 46-year-old-car) who was aboard the car for about two weeks in need of medical treatment.

2. On December 30, 2018, the Defendant entered “K” in the driver’s name column of the report as the head of the police station at the location described in Paragraph 1, at around 12:45, and the head of the police station at the expressway patrol zone at the seat of the I zone, prepared a report on the drinking driving of the Defendant’s resident registration number to K, who is a pro-friendly student, using the PDA device, and then requested the signature of the Defendant, and then issued a PDA device to J who is unaware of the fact.

arrow