A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant’s fraud against the victim C did not have any particular income, and it was difficult for the Plaintiff to normally operate the number system as an owner because all the members were not recruited from the first operation of the number system, and there was no intention or ability to pay the amount even if the Defendant received the payment of the amount of the fraternity from the victim, because there was no intention or ability to pay the amount of the fraternity, because the Defendant had been operating the system by the so-called return prevention method, such as paying the amount of the fraternity by making a loan due to the shortage of operating funds while operating several number systems, and making a new system and using the fraternity first as a loan loan No. 1 and 2.

On November 13, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim at an original house restaurant located in Gangnam-dong, Gangnam-gu, Gangnam-gu, the Defendant organized “20 million won for each month, one million won for each month, and 27 foot 27 pages (27 pages). If a monthly payment is to be made one million won, the Defendant would make a false statement to the fourth degree.”

The Defendant received KRW 1 million on the same day as the deposit money from the victim, and KRW 2 million on December 15, 2012 from the victim on two occasions in total.

2. Around September 14:00 on September 27, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim’s house located in Gangseo-si E, stating that “The Defendant would use only two months if he/she borrowed 10 million won, and make repayment without molding until December 27, 2012.”

However, as in Paragraph 1, the defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the money even if he borrowed the money from the victim because the money was insufficient to pay the money while operating the number system.

The Defendant received a total of KRW 10 million from the victim on the same day as the loan money, KRW 6.5 million on October 10, 2012, and KRW 3 million on October 28, 2012, and acquired it by deception on three occasions on a total of KRW 19.5 million.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement; 1.1.