1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The contents of the Plaintiff’s assertion in the trial of the first instance do not differ from the contents of the Plaintiff’s assertion in the trial of the first instance, and it is justifiable to find the fact-finding and judgment of the first instance court that the Plaintiff cannot be deemed as a person of distinguished service to the State because it is difficult to recognize that the instant difference occurred due to the Plaintiff’s duty or education and training directly related to the national security or the protection of the people’s lives and property, even if examining the Plaintiff’s assertion together with the evidence submitted in the first instance and the trial of the first instance court, it cannot be deemed as a person of distinguished service to the State

Therefore, the reasoning for the court's reasoning for this case is as follows: (a) each court's "this court" shall be dismissed as "the first instance court"; (b) the 3rd and 4th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 6th of the 5th of the 6th of the 6th of the 5th of the 5th of the 8th of the 8th of the 5th of the 5th of the 1st of the 1st of the 3th of the 3th of the 3th of the 1st of the judgment.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case should be dismissed as it is without merit. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is just, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.