Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

At around 23:50 on September 13, 2014, the Defendant: (a) under the influence of alcohol in Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul Underground “Cju,” and (b) Dozed D, the owner of the drinking house, and (c) received a 112 report and received a request from the head F of the police station affiliated with the Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo Police Station E-gu, Seoul for a police station for a police station for a police station for a police station for a police station to send a boom at the main store, and assaulted the above F F’s bump with his hand at least twice.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to F and D;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act requires a strict punishment of the defendant in that it interferes with a police officer’s legitimate execution of duties by exercising violence against a police officer on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1). However, the defendant's primary crime recognized his mistake and is divided. The crime of this case appears to have been committed contingently while under the influence of alcohol, and other factors of sentencing specified in the argument of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, occupation, etc., shall be determined by taking into account the following factors of sentencing