logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2014.05.30 2013고단2284
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Doing Vehicles) and Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Non-accidenting Measures) provided that the Defendant engaged in driving of a car in SPP area C, and that the Defendant, around 00:50 on August 7, 2013, proceeded with a road of one-lane way in front of the Dobong-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-ri, Malaysia, and turn to the left from the direction of the cooking box.

Since there is a yellow on-and-off intersection, there was a duty of care to check whether a person engaged in driving service has a cross-vehicles by reducing the speed or temporarily suspending the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went to the left by his negligence and was driven by the Defendant at the right side of the motor vehicle in the instant Swiss area, and was driven by the victim D (55 years old) driving from the right side of the said motor vehicle from the bend to the gold village.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by the above occupational negligence, suffered injury to the victim D, such as 6 cage cage cage cage fages, etc., which requires approximately 6 weeks of medical treatment to the victim F (the 48 years of age) from the victim F (the 48 years of age), and at the same time, damaged the victim G-owned taxi to have approximately 10,109,136 won of repair cost, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim.

2. No person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall operate any motor vehicle on a road unless he/she has subscribed to the mandatory insurance of motor vehicles;

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated the car with the automobile in which the automobile owner did not subscribe to the automobile mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each written statement of DH prepared by the police;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Mandatory insurance policies;

1.Each.

arrow