1. It connects each point of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 1 of the annexed drawings on the ground of 54303 square meters in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do.

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Basic facts

A. In order to install the instant structure on or around December 3, 1998, the Plaintiff, D, and E obtained the purpose of using and occupying the site of fishery harbor in the instant land for the purpose of using and occupying the site of 404 square meters in the instant land as the “comprehensive fishery product treatment site”, and obtained the permit to use and occupy fishery harbor facilities for one year during the period of use and occupation (hereinafter “instant permit to occupy and use”) by setting the period of use and occupation as one year.

B. Around May 199, the name of the Plaintiff, D, and E: (a) the structure was built on the Franchisor of the Yanan-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do; (b) the structure was built on a plastic pipe, the purpose of use of which was “fishery products,” and (c) the construction of the structure was carried out from June 1996 to August 199; and (d) E leased only the name for obtaining the permission to occupy and use the instant fishery products; (c) the Plaintiff waived the business of the instant fishery products processing center at the time of the construction of the instant structure; and (d) the Defendant and D bear one-half the expenses actually incurred in the construction of

(A) As of May 14, 1999 to April 15, 200, the Defendant assumed that KRW 2,085,00,000, half of the installation cost of the instant structure had been borne by D. Accordingly, the instant structure owned 1/2 shares, and the Defendant owned 1/2 shares, and the Plaintiff acquired 1/2 shares of the instant structure from D around November 1, 1999, and received 1/2 shares from D around September 2001, and received 1/2 shares of the instant structure as of the date of closing argument, and the remainder 1/2 shares are owned by the Plaintiff and the Defendant respectively.

C. Meanwhile, as D submitted a waiver of the permit to occupy and use in the instant case on November 13, 1999, the permit for extension was granted on a yearly basis with regard to the permit to occupy and use in the name of the Plaintiff and E, and since September 27, 2010, the permit for extension of the permit to use and use in the instant case was granted under the Plaintiff’s sole name.

The defendant's related cases [this Court 2010da4310, 2010Gadan9582 (the defendant's lawsuit as an independent party, the Daejeon District Court).