logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.06.27 2014고합17
변호사법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

60,000,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

The additional collection charge shall be equivalent to the above additional collection charge.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant has served as a police officer (final position police officer) belonging to the Suwon Police Station after going through the East Prison Criminal Police Team from August 1993 to August 2000.

The Defendant: (a) requested the police officer in charge of Busan to contact the victim D, who was aware of his knowledge in the course of investigating by the International Criminal Investigation Team of Busan District Police Agency, to ask the victim D, who is operating a casino in Cambodia, to ask the victim D to introduce the victim D and request the victim D to complete the case properly through the cost of the police officer in charge as the victim D, and (b) requested the victim D to introduce the victim D, who was from the former police officer and could complete the case.

On December 2, 2011, the Defendant: “When the Defendant calls with the victim D through the introduction of Scman E, he/she would have the victim’s interviewed with the former police officer, and would have the case resolved well without being punished by the head of the team in charge of the Busan District Police Agency.” On January 23, 2012, the Defendant managed the casino-related funds of the victim D at the G welfare center located in the Mannam-gu F, Mannam-si, Sungnam-si, and demanded the victim H who was investigated together with the suspicion that he/she had attempted to perform the casino operation affairs and KRW 50 million as the street funds for the said case, and around January 23, 2012, or around January 23, 2012; or

1. On February 24, 2012, at the coffee shop where it is impossible to know the trade name in the Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, E receives KRW 50 million from the victim H, and on February 2, 2012, after allowing E again to receive KRW 10 million from the victim H, the Defendant made a telephone call with the victim “to ensure that the case may be resolved well because he received money.”

arrow