A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

Punishment of the crime

On October 26, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment by the Cheongju District Court for obstructing the performance of official duties, etc., and completed the execution of the sentence in the Cheongju prison on July 1, 2012.

The defendant assumes that the defendant will make a loan by misrepresenting a financial institution to many unspecified victims in the Republic of Korea using telephone.

It is a member of the telephone financial fraud organization that obtains money under the pretext of insurance premiums, fees, etc. for guarantee by deception (hereinafter referred to as "scaming").

The Defendant, in sequence, in collusion with C (the head of the Dong name D Office, the Secretary), E, F, G (the former interim manager), H, I, J, K, L, M, M, N,O, P, Q, R, and other many other officers and employees to commit fraud. C, the role of operating and managing the whole of the above telephone financial fraud organization, the role of intermediate managers such as E, F, and G, the role of managing the call center office located within the Do of China, and the staff of the call center including the Defendant, by telephone from the Do of China to induce many unspecified victims to deposit the amount of damage caused by deception.

In collusion with the aforementioned members of the telephone financial fraud organization, the Defendant, at the call center located in the Chinese Cheongdo around August 5, 2013, misrepresented the victim S by phoneing it to make a loan by paying the fees such as the insurance premium, stamp, deposit fee, computer fee, etc.

“Falsely speaking to the purport that it was “” and the member received KRW 300,000 from the victims to the Saemaul Bank account on the same day, and acquired KRW 2,55,714,005 in total from August 5, 2013 to June 5, 2014, including the transfer of KRW 1,730 from the victims to June 5, 2014.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against each prosecutor of the defendant;

1. Copy of the protocol concerning the examination of suspect to the prosecution regarding N;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. K, T, M, U, V, W, L, X, Y, P, Z, AA, AB, AC,J, and AD.