Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On September 15:40 on September 15, 2017, the Defendant expressed that the victim C (68 years of age) who is the head of the on-site working group “Neb. Had. Had. Had. f. Had. Had. f. Had. Had. f. f. f. f. b. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. d. 15:

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant asserts that there was no assault against the victim as stated in the facts constituting a crime in the judgment, and that there was no injury as stated in the judgment, such as the defendant's act, even if there was no injury as stated in the facts constituting a crime.

However, the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly examined by this court, i.e., (i) the victim consistently asserts that he was assaulted by the defendant from the investigative agency; (ii) the victim's medical examination report submitted by the victim of an injury, which generally grasps the cause of the injury based on the victim's statement; and (iii) the part and degree of the injury inflicted by mobilization of medical expertise and directly proves that the injury as stated therein was caused by the criminal act of the defendant. However, although the date and time of the diagnosis of the injury and the written medical examination of the injury, the victim did not have any circumstance to suspect credibility in the course of the issuance of the written medical examination, and there was no special circumstance to suspect credibility in the situation where the victim's injury was caused by the victim's injury.