1. The defendant of the plaintiff D among the judgment of the first instance, including the plaintiff D's claim against the defendant G that was reduced by this court.

1. The reasoning of the court of first instance’s explanation concerning this case is as follows. The plaintiffs’ assertion added in the trial of the court of first instance is identical to the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(No separate attachment shall be made by citing Attached Form 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance as it is). The 6th "current" shall be deleted.

Part 6 of the 17th page ".............." are as follows:

In the case of ownership transfer registration due to termination of title trust, which was filed by J against the plaintiffs and defendant E, the Busan District Court 2015Kadan33164 decided on January 21, 2019, the above court rendered a judgment on July 5, 2016 that "the part occupied by J [50 m2] among the land in this case was successively connected to each of the points of "(b) and 50 m2,000 square meters in order] as to the plaintiffs and defendant E's share in this case, the above judgment became final and conclusive on January 21, 2019, and as a result, the above part of the land in this case was divided into the land in this case and owned by Busan Q2, Busan, 50 m2,98,7,66, and 30 m281 m281."

Part 13 (3) or less shall be deleted and the following shall be added:

On the other hand, with respect to the amount of unjust enrichment before November 5, 2016, the Health Unit, first of all, the amount equivalent to the rent for the portion occupied by Defendant G out of the instant land, is calculated by the appropriate method, which adds the necessary expense by multiplying the basic price of the relevant land by the expected interest rate, and the Plaintiff D acquires the shares of the instant land from October 25, 2013.