logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2016.11.08 2016고정1558
사기방조
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 4, 2015, the Defendant: (a) heard from a person who had misrepresented the loan company staff at the Defendant’s home located in Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, the Defendant: (b) held that the Defendant was a member of the Defendant’s bank account (hereinafter “C”) in his name, who was named in the name of the Defendant at the Defendant’s home located in Gwangjin-gu, Seoul; and (c) held that the Defendant was a member of the Defendant’s bank account (hereinafter “C”) in his name, who was named in the name of the Defendant, and transferred the amount of KRW 3 million to the staff; and (d) borrowed KRW 9-1 million per day to the employee; and (e) consented to the recognition that the person who was named in the name was the member of the Defendant’s name was the member of the Defendant’s bank account (hereinafter “C”) in his name, Korea bank account (hereinafter “Account number”): (c) and (d) gave the account number in his name, and (e) bank account number (F).

On the other hand, on June 4, 2015, at around 10:45, the person in poor name calls to the victim G, and misrepresent himself with the prosecution investigator and the prosecutor in order, and it is necessary to confirm whether the person is an accomplice or another victim because two heads of the agricultural banks and one bank are in the name of the victim and two heads of the one bank are in the possession of the possessions, and the victim is an accomplice or another victim. On the other hand, the person in poor name received money from the victim to the above company bank account under the name of the defendant at around 13:30,000 won on the same day.

On the other hand, the Defendant received a demand from the above person who was unaware of his name to “the Defendant demanded to withdraw the money from the Defendant’s corporate bank account because the money was deposited to the Defendant’s corporate bank account,” and, despite being aware that the said money was acquired due to the above criminal act, sought to withdraw the above amount of damage from the Japanese corporate bank near the Japanese Commercial Bank located in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, but failed to withdraw

Accordingly, the defendant is easy to commit the crime of deceiving the victim by deceiving him as a singishing method.

arrow