beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.
, however, from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A and Defendant B subscribed to six insurance products from March 14, 2007 by 2 insurance companies (209,330 won each month’s insurance premium), and Defendant B subscribed to one insurance product from May 15, 2008 to one insurance company (64,950 won each month’s insurance premium), and had the intent to receive insurance proceeds by applying for hospitalization daily allowances, etc. to the insurance company for hospitalized treatment, even though there is no need for hospitalized treatment.
1. Defendant A hospitalized in the F Hospital located in Gyeongnam-si Kim, Kim Jong-si for 15 days from July 29, 2013 to August 12, 2013 due to the 2,3 metro gate, etc.
However, the facts are that Defendant A did not have symptoms, so it was sufficient to provide outpatient treatment only, and Defendant A did not receive proper hospitalized treatment, such as from time to time during the duration of hospitalization and viewing personal duties.
Nevertheless, around August 12, 2013, Defendant A submitted relevant documents, such as a written confirmation of hospitalization and discharge, as if the victim’s red fire was actually hospitalized, and applied for insurance money, such as the daily amount of hospitalization, and received KRW 812,810 on the same day from the said victim insurance company.
Defendant
A was paid KRW 70,870,964 in total as insurance money by the victim insurance company through the same method over 20 times, such as the list of crimes (A) as shown in attached Table (A) between around that time and May 4, 2015.
2. Defendant B was hospitalized in the F Hospital located in Gyeongnam Kim-si, Kim Jong-si for fifteen (15) days from September 24, 2012 to October 8, 2012, Defendant B was hospitalized in the right satitis, etc.
However, the facts were that Defendant B did not have symptoms, so it was sufficient to treat the patient at any time during the period of hospitalization and did not receive proper hospitalized treatment, such as visiting from time to time during the period of hospitalization.
Nevertheless, the defendant.