All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment’s appeal in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, the lower court was justifiable to have found the Defendant guilty of this case’s facts charged (excluding the charge without merit and the part not guilty of the reasoning) on the grounds indicated in its reasoning. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules

2. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment regarding the prosecutor’s appeal in light of the record, it is justifiable for the lower court to have rendered a judgment of not guilty or not guilty on the facts charged of the instant case (excluding the portion guilty) on the grounds stated in its reasoning, on the grounds stated in its reasoning, and to maintain the first instance judgment that acquitted or acquitted on the grounds of the same. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by exceeding the

On the other hand, the prosecutor appealed against the guilty portion of the judgment of the court below, but there is no indication of the grounds for appeal in the petition of appeal and there is no indication of the grounds for appeal in the statement of reasons for appeal.

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.