logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.11.09 2018고정1465
상해
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

Part of innocence (Infliction of Injury)

1. On November 1, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 17:30 on November 1, 2017, around 17:30, the Defendant: (b) obstructed the removal of pl cards installed under the lien by the victim D; and (c) obstructed both arms and arms of the victim by both hand; and (d) obstructed the wall.

As a result, the Defendant’s written indictment for injury to the Defendant, which requires two weeks’ medical treatment, stated in the Defendant’s “inwards, tensions, salt pans, and tensions of the erode,” but according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the name of the Defendant’s injury diagnosis document “the erode of the erode of the erode, tension, erode of the erode, and tensions and tensions.” As such, the Defendant’s written indictment for injury to the Defendant is correct ex officio.

B. A.

2. Determination

(a)an injury in the crime of injury means impairing the completeness of the body of the victim or impairing physiological functions;

In addition, in a criminal case where the victim’s statement and the defendant’s statement are sufficient evidence to prove the facts of the crime, the existence of the fact of the injury and the relation with the person in question can be acknowledged to reach the extent that there is no reasonable doubt. Thus, when there are circumstances to suspect the objectivity and credibility of the written diagnosis, it shall be very careful in determining the probative value thereof.

In particular, if it is issued only with medical possibility based on the victim's subjective appeal, etc. that the injury diagnosis certificate has mainly been issued, the date of the diagnosis and the date of preparation of the diagnosis shall be the injury.

arrow