A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 27, 2014, the legal violation D, from July 2013 to April 2014, issued an amount equivalent to KRW 390 million to E under the name of the loan, and did not receive the refund, sought a scheme for filing a complaint against the said E in fraud.

On June 27, 2014, the Defendant told D that “A police officer who is well aware of inside and outside of the police station is serving in the net police station, upon complaint of E with the net police station, he/she will arrest E through the police officer, and upon detention, he/she was detained on August 24, 2014, and received seven million won from D as a precedent fee from the above office around August 27, 2014.

As a result, the defendant received money and valuables under the pretext of solicitation for cases or affairs handled by public officials.

2. On May 19, 2015, violation D of the Legal Act delivered 20 million won to H under the pretext of acquiring the shares of H on October 2, 2013, but did not receive shares. On July 18, 2014, D issued 44 million won as the withdrawal cost of the auction of the land in H’s name, which was intended to purchase D, to H on July 18, 2014, but the auction was not suspended, and the said H sought a scheme to file a complaint against the crime of fraud.

On September 13, 2015, the Defendant told D that “A team working at the Net Police Station has been getting off to the police station due to personnel movement, so it is called to the prosecutors’ office at the same time to issue a complaint, and if it is good to do so, at the same time.” On April 2015, the Defendant received 5 million won as the honorarium for the inn police station from D at the K coffee shop located in the J of the Republic of Korea on May 13, 2015, when the case against H was forwarded to the prosecutor’s office and the registration of land was transferred to D at the end of the criminal conciliation.

As a result, the defendant received money and valuables under the pretext of solicitation for cases or affairs handled by public officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. D. L.