1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

. the defendant.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or addition as follows. Thus, this is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil

2. Parts used or added;

A. The 4th 9th son of the judgment of the court of first instance in which the phrase “B Nos. 1 through 12” was written shall be deemed to read “B Nos. 1 through 14.”

The 4th 9,10th 9, and 10th 10th 10 of the first instance judgment "(including a branch number if there is a branch number)" shall be "(including a branch number; hereinafter the same shall apply)."

In the fifth 19th 19th 5th 19th 19th 19th 19th 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 3th 192

The 6th six-party 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be referring to a "gymmetric indication" as a "gymmetric indication."

B. The Plaintiff asserts that the first instance court and the instant court were issued a certificate of overseas work in order to verify that the Plaintiff actually continued to work as the Defendant’s employee even after submitting the instant certificate of resignation, and the said court submitted the certificate of overseas work (Evidence A 30).

However, as seen earlier, the Plaintiff submitted the instant resignation document on September 28, 2012 and was treated as retirement from the Defendant on October 3, 2012. According to the Plaintiff’s evidence No. 30, the said certificate of overseas service was issued on September 18, 2012, which was issued on September 18, 2012, and was still in the status under the Defendant’s jurisdiction, and thus, it is insufficient to recognize that the Plaintiff had a substantial relationship with the Defendant after the submission of the instant resignation.

In addition, even if the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court of first instance seems to have been included in the evidence No. 19 through 29, 31 through 36 submitted by the plaintiff in this court, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are just, and there is no ground for appeal by the plaintiff.