A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

The request of the applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

[2016 Highest 744] On October 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim D, stating that “A loan is to be made as security, and if the Defendant borrowed KRW 10 million to require land appraisal costs, etc. in order to obtain a loan, he/she shall obtain a loan as security and repay the loan within one month.”

However, at the time of fact, the Defendant did not intend to borrow the land in Gyeonggi-do as collateral, and did not have any authority over the above land, and on the other hand, did not subscribe to automobile liability insurance, so even if he borrowed the above money from the damaged party, there was no intention or ability to repay it.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and obtained the delivery of KRW 10 million from the victim, i.e., the victim from the seat, and acquired the amount equivalent to the same.

[2017 Highest 9] The Defendant is a person who provides real estate consulting, the victim C is a person who operates a real estate development company in the trade name of “F” in the original city E, and the victim G was a person who operated the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H building and the third floor of the third floor to operate a mutual non-real estate development company.

1. The Defendant committing the crime against the Victim C at the “F office” office located in the Won-si, Seoul, around November 2014, where the victim provided three parcels of land (3,698 square meters in Won-si, i, J, K, etc.) as collateral and received loans of KRW 8,000 in total amount of 3 parcels of land (8,000 square meters in Won-si, i, J, and n, etc.).

A false statement was made to the effect that “The victim asked the appraiser to increase the amount of appraisal so that he/she is well aware of the payment, thereby allowing him/her to get a loan of KRW 2 billion.” In lieu of fees, the victim made a false statement to the effect that “the victim requires a loan of KRW 20 billion.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not know well at the time, and did not confirm in advance whether the land in this case can be loaned as security.