All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. Examining the following circumstances in relation to the Defendant case and the person against whom the attachment order was requested (hereinafter “Defendant”), including the age, conduct, intelligence, and environment of the victim, the relationship with the victims, the motive and consequence of the instant crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the determination of the lower court’s imprisonment with prison labor for 17 years cannot be deemed to be extremely unfair even when considering the circumstances asserted by the Defendant and the public defender.

2. The argument that the period of attachment of an electronic tracking device is too unfair is not a ground of appeal as stipulated in each subparagraph of Article 383 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and thus cannot be a legitimate ground of appeal.

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.