1. The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to the Plaintiff KRW 49,00,000 and Defendant B with respect thereto from January 23, 2013.

Basic Facts

D apartment 103 Dong 4, 103, located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, was divided into 401 and 402 after the construction of a new building, but the actual use was divided into 401 marks 401 and labels 405, different from the registration entered in the public register, and 402 marks were used as marks 401, labels 402, and labels 403.

On February 4, 2010, D apartment 103 Dong 4, located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, was registered as the alteration of Nos. 401 and 402 on the building ledger, and the previous Nos. 402 to 403.

(A) On February 27, 2010, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”) with Defendant B, a licensed real estate agent, who operated the E Licensed Real Estate Agent Office on the building ledger, with F and one other, as “D apartment 103 Dong 401 (No. 402) located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul (hereinafter “the lease object of this case”)” (hereinafter “the lease object of this case”), the lease deposit amount of KRW 70 million, the lease deposit amount of KRW 70 million, and the lease period from February 27, 2010 to February 26, 2012.

The phrase “written explanation of confirmation” of the object of brokerage attached to the instant lease agreement (I) includes the “written copy of the register” in the “written description of confirmation of the object of brokerage” (I) attached to the instant lease agreement, and the term “rights other than ownership” refers to the “written establishment of collateral mortgage (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 110,000,000 won, maximum debt amount: 110,000,000 won, and the mortgagee of collateral security: the new bank (Dong branch)” and the term “matters regarding the right of object that is not related to the real right or publicly notified” remains in the blank.

After receiving the leased object of this case, the Plaintiff completed the move-in report on March 5, 2010 by specifying his domicile as “D apartment 103 Dong 402 located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, and received the fixed date on the instant lease agreement.”

The Seoul Seodaemun-gu where the plaintiff actually resided after the conclusion of the instant lease agreement.