The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On October 21, 2012, at around 21:35, the Defendant left a vehicle to drive on behalf of the victim C (55 years of age and women) who is a substitute driver on the street in front of the Seosung City cafeteria, and caused a defect of 10 minutes of the vehicle to see the victim’s desire to see for about 10 minutes of the bit of bit of bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the bit.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act and can be prosecuted only upon the victim’s complaint under Article 312 of the same Act. Since the victim’s complaint can be deemed to have been withdrawn by mutual consent with the Defendant around February 21, 2013, which is after the prosecution of the instant case, since the victim’s complaint against the Defendant is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.