A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 9, 2009, the Defendant: “Around April 9, 2015, the 2015 Highest 524, the Defendant was aware of the Defendant’s “D” restaurant operated by the Defendant in Busan City/Gu, and there is a need for money to narrow the existing restaurant and expand.

A loan of KRW 20 million shall be repaid after one year.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, in fact, the Defendant was a bad credit holder at the time, was more than KRW 100 million, and there was no special property, and thus, even if he/she paid interest even if he/she was to operate a restaurant, he/she did not have any intent or ability to fully repay such interest even if he/she did not borrow money from the injured party.

The Defendant received 20 million won in cash from the injured party, namely, from the injured party, in exchange for a loan, and received on July 10, 2009, cash of 6.2 million won in cash on October 12, 2009, cash of 3.2 million won in cash on October 9, 2009, cash of 6 million won in cash on February 12, 2010, and three million won in cash on April 9, 2010, respectively.

Accordingly, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received a total of KRW 43 million over six times.

On September 10, 2010, the Defendant: (a) entered the Plaintiff’s 10,000 foot No. 20,000,000,000,000 won, organized by the Victim F of the Victim F in Busan Dong-dong, and received KRW 30,00,000,00,000, in total, from the Plaintiff’s “D restaurant” operated by the Defendant in Busan Dong-gu, by taking part in the number fraternity No. 3,5, and eight, and taking part in the above number fraternity No. 3,5, and eight, and taking part in the fraternity No. 8, and taking part in the fraternity No. 3,000,000,000,000 won from the Defendant’s “D restaurant” operated by the Defendant in Busan Dong-gu, under the name of the fraternity.

However, the defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the fraternity every month even if he received the fraternity money. The defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay it properly.

The defendant.