Text
The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.
Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.
purport, purport, and.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The plaintiff is the mother of defendant B, and the defendant C is the mother of defendant B's son.
B. On December 26, 191, the Plaintiff and Defendant B’s mother D operated the original unit price at the said store by August 25, 1999, with the permission to use the store for the lower part of the lower part of the first floor E of the Busan Dong-gu, Busan, and for the F and G of the first floor (hereinafter “instant store”).
D died on October 7, 1999
(hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”). (c)
Defendant B operated the said store with the permission to use the store on August 26, 1999, and thereafter Defendant C received the permission to use the store on June 25, 2018.
Defendant B transferred KRW 300,000 per month to the Plaintiff’s account from February 2007 to May 2013, 2013, with the exception of the transfer of KRW 300,000 won on April 30, 2013, and KRW 300,000 per month on May 31, 2013.
B, from June 2013 to May 2018, 400,000 won was transferred each month.
E. Defendant C transferred KRW 400,000 per month to the Plaintiff’s account from July 2018 to December 2018.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 5, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The parties' assertion
A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff bears a half of the purchase fund of KRW 70 million at the time when the Deceased purchased the instant store around 1998.
The Plaintiff, around 200, between Defendant B and the deceased, paid part of the purchase fund of the above store to the Plaintiff, instead of taking the name of the store in this case from the deceased, by the time of death, and entered into an agreement between Defendant B and Defendant B to adjust the amount to a higher level of the payment.
Since Defendant B transferred the name of the instant store to Defendant C, Defendant C concurrently acquired the obligation to pay the life annuity concurrently, and the amount of the life annuity increased to KRW 400,000 per month, the Defendants jointly and severally agreed with the Plaintiff from January 1, 2019, which is the date on which the payment of the life annuity was discontinued.