1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.

The plaintiff's primary claim is dismissed.

B. The Defendant’s February 2017.

1. The reasoning for this part of the disposition by the court is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this part is cited pursuant to Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The reasoning for this part of the Plaintiff’s assertion is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this part of the claim is acceptable in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the

(The plaintiff's argument in the trial is the same as the plaintiff's argument in the first instance trial).

It shall be as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes.

C. 1) Determination 1) Determination on the legitimacy of a non-scheduled disposition of a person who rendered distinguished service to the State (a) provides that unlike the former Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Service to the State (amended by Act No. 11041, Sept. 15, 201; hereinafter “former Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Service to the State”), Article 4(1)6 of the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Service to the State (hereinafter “Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc.”) and Article 4(1)6 of the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Service to the State (hereinafter “Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc.”) that

Unlike this, a wounded person is eligible for veteran’s compensation pursuant to Article 2(1)2 of the Act on Support for Persons Eligible for Veteran’s Compensation, which is not directly related to the national defense, etc. (hereinafter “the Veterans’ Compensation Act”).

The purport of the former Act on Persons of Distinguished Service to the State is to divide persons of distinguished service to the State by amending the Act on Persons of Distinguished Service to the State is to acknowledge a proximate causal relationship between the performance of their duties, education and training, and the death or injury.