(영문) 대구지방법원 의성지원 2018.09.13 2018고정32

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 의성지원 2018.09.13 2018고정32

사기

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 3, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for fraud at the Daegu District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 28, 2018.

1. On September 8, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 08:40 on September 8, 2017, in the Victim C’s Operation “D” located in the Gyeongbuk-gun, Seongbuk-gun; (b) was committed as if the Defendant had no money in fact and had no intent or ability to pay a tea value; and (c) was placed as if the value of the tea was paid to the Defendant; and (d) ordered the Defendant’s red ginseng 4 residues, which is the total market value of KRW 20,000,000 from the injured party, acquired economic benefits equivalent to the same amount.

2. On September 14, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 22:40 on September 14, 2017, the Defendant: (b) received the victim F operation “G amusement shop” in the Seongbuk-gun of Seongbuk-gun; (c) was engaged in the act as if he did not have any intent or ability to pay liquor due to the lack of money in fact; and (d) ordered the victim’s alcohol, alcohol, and alcohol services; and (c) received the victim’s pecuniary benefits equivalent to the same amount after being provided with the victim’s alcohol and alcohol services.

3. On September 30, 2017, the Defendant: (a) committed the crime of September 30, 2017, on September 30, 2017, issued a L business call taxi operated by the victim K in front of the J restaurant located in the Daegu-gu District of G, Daegu-gu; (b) as if the Defendant did not have an intent or ability to pay the cab cost and brea value because of the lack of money in fact, and paid it to the victim without the intention or ability to pay the cab value; and (c) on the victim’s arrival of the Frisung-gun of the Gyeongsung-gun, the Defendant paid the cab cost immediately, and (d) lent KRW 11,000,000 to the frith of the Fridong-gu, Daegu-gu, the Defendant acquired the frith of the frith of the frith to the frith of the frith; and (d) made the victim acquire the frith of the frith of the f.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to C, F, and K 1.

유사 판례

-부산지방법원 동부지원 2018.01.25 2017고단2423

-대구지방법원 2017.12.15 2017고정1725

-의정부지방법원 2016.10.14 2016고단817

-수원지방법원 2016.06.01 2016고단1234

-청주지방법원 2018.01.31 2017고단1921