1. The Defendant’s KRW 65,932,648 as well as the Plaintiff’s KRW 5% per annum from April 19, 2011 to December 12, 2013.

A. According to the purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 6, the plaintiff concluded a contract with the defendant and the defendant to perform supervision over the construction of the main road construction works, the main road construction works, the main road construction works, the main road construction works, the main road construction works, the main road construction works, the main road construction works, the main road construction works, the main road construction works, the main road construction works, the main road construction works, the main road construction works, the main road construction works, the main road construction works, the main road construction works, the main road construction works, and the main road construction works, the main road construction works, the main road construction works, the main road construction works, the main road construction works, the main road construction works, the main road construction works, the main road construction works, the main road construction works, the main road construction works, the main road construction works, the main road construction works, the main road construction works, the main road construction works, and the main road construction works, the main road construction works, the main road construction works, the main road construction works, and the main road construction works, the main road construction works, the main road construction works.

B. According to the above facts, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 65,932,648 won and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 5% per annum under the Civil Act from April 19, 2011 to December 12, 2013, which is the delivery date of payment order, and 20% per annum under the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings, from the next day to the day of full payment.

C. Therefore, the plaintiff's claim shall be accepted on the grounds of its reasoning, and it is so decided as per Disposition.