logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.05.25 2017가단144490
공유물분할
Text

1. The remaining amount of each real estate listed in the separate sheet after deducting the expenses for auction from the proceeds of auction;

Reasons

1. Indication of Claim: The plaintiffs and the defendants shared each real estate listed in the separate sheet according to their respective shares ratio. However, although the defendants requested a partition of co-owned property against the defendants, they did not comply with the request or did not agree on the disposal method, etc.

Although Defendant D’s intention is not confirmed, the remaining Defendants did not express the opposing opinion regarding the method of partition of co-owned property by auction of the Plaintiffs’ assertion.

2. Defendant C and G: Judgment on deemed confessions (Articles 208(3)2 and 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act): Defendant D by public notice (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act). Defendant E and F: Judgment by confessions.

arrow