Of the judgment of the court of first instance, KRW 21,973,34 against each of the plaintiffs and its objection against the defendant from January 10, 2020 to November 18, 2020.

1. With respect to this part of the judgment on the basic facts and the grounds for a claim, the reasoning of this court is as follows: 2-2 of the judgment of the first instance.

(b)(2)(b)(1) The portion of the Plaintiff A and B’s payment is altered as follows and 2-h.

In addition to the deletion of the "port", the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance are the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and therefore, it is cited pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. 2. The defendant asserts that the amount of the plaintiffs paid to the plaintiff A 20 million won as the deposit for the deposit for the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the lease of the plaintiff, the amount of KRW 10.5 million as the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the lease of the plaintiff B, KRW 5,935,00 won as the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the lease of the plaintiff, KRW 10 million as the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the plaintiff C, KRW 10,705,000,000 and KRW 54,505,000 shall be included in

A person shall be appointed.

3. Additional determination

A. Even if the defendant's assertion that there is a shortage of legal reserve of inheritance, the amount equivalent to the inheritance shares of the plaintiffs out of funeral money should be offset against the amount of legal reserve of inheritance.

B. The amount of donation sent under the pretext of assistance or condolence money, etc. when a person dies, shall be brought up with the mental suffering of the bereaved family and reduced the economic burden of the bereaved family members resulting from funeral, and shall contribute to the stabilization of the livelihood of the bereaved family members. As to the remaining portion after being appropriated for funeral expenses, barring any special circumstance, the co-inheritors of the deceased person shall be deemed to have acquired the right in proportion to their respective shares of inheritance (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 65Da2319, Sept. 20, 196; 92Da2998, Aug. 18, 1992). In full view of the descriptions of evidence No. 23 and arguments No. 23, the facts that the plaintiffs and the defendant received KRW 1,924,00,00 from the deceased E’s funeral process, and the facts that the plaintiffs and the defendant received KRW 1,924,00 in proportion to their respective shares of inheritance.