beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.
except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On December 10, 2012, at around 06:50 on December 10, 2012, the Defendant driven a B SP car, and driven the road in front of the Geumcheon Fire Station, which is located in the two villages of Gwangju Seo-gu, along the two lanes from the distance of wind.
In this place, there was a duty of care to safely drive according to the new subparagraph after checking whether a person who engages in driving service at a crosswalk with a signal, etc. has a duty of care to reduce the speed and to see well the right and the right and the right.
Nevertheless, by neglecting this and neglecting the signal, the Defendant got out of the right side of the Defendant’s vehicle the left side of the victim C (at the age of 54) who dried the crosswalk from the right side of the Defendant’s proceeding to the left side according to the pedestrian signal.
The Defendant suffered injury, such as pressure duplicating 2 weeks in need of approximately 12 weeks of treatment due to these occupational negligence.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. C’s statement;
1. A medical certificate;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the actual survey report;
1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (1), Article 3 (2) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Criminal Facts, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act shall take into consideration the following circumstances: (a) although it is necessary to strictly punish the defendant considering the fact that the defendant was shocking the victim, who violated the signal by the defendant, and that