The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On September 21, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 20:20 on September 21, 2018, at the restaurant “D” operated by C in Hanam-dong-dong-dong-dong-gun B, the Defendant, while drinking alcohol together with C, she expressed the victim’s desire to enter the restaurant by the victim E (54 years of age) who is the husband of C, the husband of C, her entrance into the restaurant, she gets off the restaurant, she gets off the restaurant with the victim, and assaulted the victim when she tights the victim’s face, etc.

2. The facts charged in this part of the judgment fall under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent pursuant to Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the records of this case, since the victim expressed his/her intent not to punish the defendant around February 6, 2020 after the prosecution of this case was instituted, this part of the prosecution is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.