1. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) against the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff)

(a) deliver each movable set out in the separate sheet;

(b) 88,710.

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed to be combined.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a company that manufactures automobile parts, and the Defendant operates the automobile parts processing business under the trade name of “C”.

B. From January 201 to June 201, the Plaintiff produced each of the movables listed in the separate sheet, which are automobile parts gold-types, from the Defendant from around January 201, to June 201, the Plaintiff agreed that each of the instant gold-types (each of the instant gold-types is specified as “each of the instant gold-types,” and that each of the instant gold-types (each of the instant gold-types is specified as “each of the instant gold-types,” and that each of the instant gold-types is produced by using the gold-types of each of the instant gold-types to supply them to the Defendant.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant arrangement.” At the time of the Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to vest ownership of each of the instant gold surcharges in the Defendant, and ② In the case of the instant gold surcharges Nos. 3, 6 and 5, the Defendant separately paid the costs of gold production to the Plaintiff, and in the case of the instant gold surcharges Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5, as indicated below [Attachment], the Defendant divided and paid part of the costs of gold production into the unit price of each product until the production of 50,000 goods, and the amount of excess production exceeds 50,00,000 won shall be reduced from the unit price of each product to the partial payment of the cost of gold production, and the Defendant agreed to pay the Plaintiff the amount calculated by multiplying the amount less than 50,000 won by the amount less than 50,000 won by the installment payment of each of the costs of gold production.

③ As to the method of payment, a tax invoice for the products supplied by the Plaintiff to the Defendant on the last day of each month was issued, and the Defendant agreed to pay the price for the goods indicated above to the Plaintiff.

C. The Plaintiff was produced from January 2010 to April 2013.