All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence imposed by the lower court (three years of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible.

2. The lower court determined the sentence by taking into account the following circumstances as revealed in the lower judgment’s “reasons for sentencing”.

[3] On May 10, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act at the Cheongju District Court on February 20, 1998, on July 12, 2002, on August 29, 2003, with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act at the Cheongju District Court on August 29, 2003, with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act at the Cheongju District Court on August 29, 2003, on May 10, 2007, with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collective weapon, etc.) at the Youngju District Court on Punishment of Violences, etc. at the Cheongju District Court on May 10, 2007, and for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. at the 16th District Court on December 8, 2010.

Despite such fact, the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case committed the same kind of violent crime even though he committed the crime in the name of two months from the completion date of the above sentence.

In particular, in the case of the crime of special injury of this case, the victim of the previous special injury crime of this case, which is a dangerous object against the victim K who is vulnerable to the crime, has inflicted a serious injury in need of approximately 6 weeks of medical treatment by the kitchen kn, which is a kitchen for several kitchens.

The Defendant was unable to receive a letter from the Victim K and J.

[The favorable circumstances] The Defendant is to substitute each of the instant crimes.