Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for one year.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants, around 14:00 on April 4, 2012, using the gap in which the surveillance of on-site employees was neglected at the construction site of the Do subway in Yeongdeungpo-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and reported to the network around the e-mail vehicle, and Defendant B placed the PVC officer in the 1.2 million won market price managed by the victim F in the place.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly stolen F's property.

2. On September 2, 2012, around 08:40 on September 2, 2012, the Defendants used the gaps in which the surveillance of field employees was neglected at the construction site of the said D subway, and reported to the network in the surrounding areas, Defendant A waiting in the vehicle of the Epoter, and Defendant B used 70 Kg in the said vehicle of the amount of 100,000 won the market price managed by the victim F in the said place.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly stolen F's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. G statements;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 331 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 53 and Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Da1548, Apr. 1, 201; Supreme Court Decision 201Da11448, Apr.

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act or more;